{"id":405,"date":"2014-01-07T07:39:30","date_gmt":"2014-01-07T07:39:30","guid":{"rendered":"http:\/\/www.crunchyspaces.com\/content\/?p=405"},"modified":"2021-04-17T02:14:10","modified_gmt":"2021-04-17T02:14:10","slug":"just-as-i-got-fed-up-with-film-i-found-eastman-double-x","status":"publish","type":"post","link":"https:\/\/www.crunchyspaces.com\/content\/just-as-i-got-fed-up-with-film-i-found-eastman-double-x\/","title":{"rendered":"Just as I was getting fed up with film\u2026 again"},"content":{"rendered":"<p>I&#8217;ve been messing about with film cameras again for about a year or so. The first time for about 15 years.<\/p>\n<p>I had embraced digital photography as soon as I could afford a decent dSLR and, with my results-driven design hat on, the final output &#8216;quality&#8217; had always been my primary goal.<\/p>\n<p><!--more-->Even in the days of film photography, when I worked as an art director for magazines, I had always strived for as &#8216;smooth&#8217;\u00a0 and noise-free photographic reproduction as was possible. This generally involved transparencies, scanned on high-end drum scanners and reproduced at the highest optical resolution for the available line-screen. Nothing wrong with this, of course.<\/p>\n<p>But with my artists\/photographer\/whatever the heck it is that I am now hat on, my priorities have changed somewhat. Hence my dabbling with film photography, and the <a href=\"https:\/\/www.crunchyspaces.com\/content\/in-with-the-old-and-in-with-the-new-also\/\">contradictions<\/a> that come with it.<\/p>\n<p>Working in a hybrid photographic workflow (I shoot film, but scan the negatives, post-process them in Photoshop and have them printed digitally), I had\u00a0 somewhat <a href=\"https:\/\/www.crunchyspaces.com\/content\/neopan-discontinued-camera-film\/\">distanced myself from the various qualities of different film emulsions<\/a>.<\/p>\n<p>I have experimented with different Kodak, Fujifilm and Ilford films, as well as different ISO speeds. I&#8217;ve even noticed some differences. But I&#8217;ve not been particularly good at keeping track of what works best for me on a consistent basis and I had been on the point of giving film a long term break \u2013 despite my growing fondness for the therapeutic &#8216;slowness&#8217; of film photography.<\/p>\n<p>Partially this was due my lack of patience with the whole process (scanning time and post processing requirements). But also because I felt myself hitting a creative block, similar to that which led me to take up film again in the first place. A change is as good as a rest, and all that\u2026<\/p>\n<p>But I&#8217;ve just shot a roll of Eastman Double-X. To me, it has a classic look. Somewhere in-between Ilford HP5+ (less grainy) and Kodak Tri-X. Beautiful tones and range. It&#8217;s hard to describe exactly why. It also works very well within my \u2013\u00a0 somewhat random \u2013 post-processing workflow. I find that I can play with it a fair amount, without destroying the essential look of the film. That said, I like the look of it so much, that I&#8217;ve not felt the need to do too much to it in post.<\/p>\n<p>Perhaps it&#8217;s just a question of keeping things fresh, but I&#8217;m hooked again \u2013 for the moment. Now then, only another ten negatives to scan\u2026<\/p>\n<!-- AddThis Advanced Settings generic via filter on the_content -->","protected":false},"excerpt":{"rendered":"<p>I&#8217;ve been messing about with film cameras again for about a year or so. The first time for about 15 years. I had embraced digital photography as soon as I could afford a decent dSLR and, with my results-driven design hat on, the final output &#8216;quality&#8217; had always been my primary goal.<!-- AddThis Advanced Settings generic via filter on wp_trim_excerpt --><\/p>\n","protected":false},"author":1,"featured_media":0,"comment_status":"closed","ping_status":"closed","sticky":false,"template":"","format":"standard","meta":{"footnotes":""},"categories":[6,18,1],"tags":[],"class_list":["post-405","post","type-post","status-publish","format-standard","hentry","category-mono","category-film-photography","category-main"],"_links":{"self":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.crunchyspaces.com\/content\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/405","targetHints":{"allow":["GET"]}}],"collection":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.crunchyspaces.com\/content\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts"}],"about":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.crunchyspaces.com\/content\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/types\/post"}],"author":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.crunchyspaces.com\/content\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/users\/1"}],"replies":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.crunchyspaces.com\/content\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/comments?post=405"}],"version-history":[{"count":21,"href":"https:\/\/www.crunchyspaces.com\/content\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/405\/revisions"}],"predecessor-version":[{"id":4929,"href":"https:\/\/www.crunchyspaces.com\/content\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/405\/revisions\/4929"}],"wp:attachment":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.crunchyspaces.com\/content\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/media?parent=405"}],"wp:term":[{"taxonomy":"category","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.crunchyspaces.com\/content\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/categories?post=405"},{"taxonomy":"post_tag","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.crunchyspaces.com\/content\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/tags?post=405"}],"curies":[{"name":"wp","href":"https:\/\/api.w.org\/{rel}","templated":true}]}}